Technology & Product Roadmap
Phase 1 — Build vs Buy Analysis
Presented by: Head of Engineering
March 2026
For comparable investment, in-house delivers 50% more scope, 100% IP ownership, and FAANG-grade architecture.
₹2.5 Cr (dev only) + ₹1.21 Cr (infra/APIs you pay) = ₹3.71 Cr total
108 features | Vendor IP | No architecture docs
₹1.80 Cr (team) + ₹1.16 Cr (infra/APIs/misc) = ₹2.96 Cr total
160+ features | 100% IP | 40K+ lines architecture
Before writing a single line of production code:
All flows clickable end-to-end
40,000+ lines, IEEE 1471 SAD
PlantUML + draw.io + Excalidraw
Class diagrams, APIs, schemas
CTO Panel grade: B+
+ Neural Bloom avatar + Brand Hub
This is ₹3 Cr+ worth of architecture consulting — delivered before Day 1 of development.
50+ additional features we need beyond their 108 P0 scope:
These 50+ features would require a separate Phase 2+ contract with Yottix at additional cost
These are Phase 1 requirements per our original design spec — deferring them creates launch gaps:
Tax & Reports
Capital gains, tax-loss harvesting, downloadable reports, tax calendar — ALL moved to Phase 2+
Estimated cost to build deferred items: ₹1.5-2.0 Cr additional if outsourced later
In-house: Same team delivers these within Year 1 at no additional development cost
| Cost Item | Yottix (Outsource) | In-House Build |
|---|---|---|
| Development | ₹2.50 Cr | ₹1.80 Cr |
| AWS Infrastructure | ₹0.78 Cr you pay | ₹0.78 Cr |
| AI API (Claude) | ₹0.13 Cr you pay | ₹0.13 Cr |
| Partner APIs | ₹0.15 Cr you pay | ₹0.10 Cr |
| SEBI / Legal | ₹0.15 Cr you pay | ₹0.15 Cr |
| Year 1 Total | ₹3.71 Cr | ₹2.96 Cr |
| Role | Count | Experience | Annual CTC | Cash (70%) | ESOP (30%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sr Backend (Java Spring) | 2 | 5-8 yrs | ₹50L | ₹35L | ₹15L |
| Sr Mobile (Kotlin CMP) | 2 | 4-7 yrs | ₹44L | ₹30.8L | ₹13.2L |
| Frontend (Next.js) | 1 | 3-5 yrs | ₹18L | ₹12.6L | ₹5.4L |
| AI/Agent Developer | 1 | 3-5 yrs | ₹30L | ₹18L | ₹12L |
| DevSecOps | 1 | 4-6 yrs | ₹22L | ₹15.4L | ₹6.6L |
| QA Engineer | 1 | 3-5 yrs | ₹15L | ₹10.5L | ₹4.5L |
| Product Manager | 1 | 5-8 yrs | ₹30L | ₹21L | ₹9L |
| Total | 9 | ₹2.09 Cr | ₹1.43 Cr | ₹0.66 Cr |
With 30% equity component: Cash burn ₹1.43 Cr/yr
Aligns team with company success. "0-to-1 story — higher ESOPs, lower cash."
Claude Code provides 2-3x productivity boost
9 developers = 18-22 effective FTEs. Boilerplate, tests, docs, Helm charts — all AI-generated.
9 reviewers from Amazon, Google, Meta, Apple, Netflix, CRED, Zeta, OpenAI, Perplexity
Clean Architecture (Uncle Bob) · DDD (Eric Evans) · Microservices Patterns (Chris Richardson) · SOLID · Hexagonal Ports & Adapters · Saga Choreography · CQRS · Transactional Outbox
| Sprint | Weeks | Focus | Key Deliverables |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | W1-2 | Foundation | Gateway, Identity (OTP, biometric), Payments (Razorpay), Mobile scaffold |
| S2 | W3-4 | Core Data | KYC (PAN + CKYC + Aadhaar), AA (FinFactor), Portfolio basics |
| S3 | W5-6 | Intelligence | MIA (Claude API, RAG, Hindi), Portfolio dashboard, Benchmarking |
| S4 | W7-8 | Commerce | MFU (fund browse, SIP, lumpsum), FD (Blostem), Insurance (Ditto) |
| S5 | W9-10 | Advisory | BYLD Score (buckets), Rebalancing, Goals, MIA tool execution |
| S6 | W11-12 | Launch | Security hardening, SEBI audit, Notifications, Beta launch |
ALPHA
BETA
MVP LAUNCH
My Intelligent Analyst — present on 130+ screens, primary interaction layer
at 10K users (25% active)
per conversation avg
No competitor has an AI advisor this deeply integrated into the wealth management journey
INA000014252
Fee-only fiduciary advisory
ARN-149832
MF distribution license
11/11 Compliant
Full statutory compliance
Advisory (BYLD Wealth) + Distribution (BYLD Capital)
Strategy Pattern switches behavior at runtime. Same user, same app, different regulatory framework. This architecture is a moat — no competitor can easily replicate it.
HIGH
12 weeks aggressive for 108 features
Mitigated: 297 screens prototyped + AI-accelerated dev (2-3x)
MEDIUM
Key roles needed Week 1
Mitigated: ESOP incentives + competitive CTC + 0-to-1 appeal
MEDIUM
Gupshup, Blostem, Ditto sandbox
Mitigated: NDAs signed for most. Sandbox by Week 3.
LOW
AI API at scale
Configurable limits + multi-model routing → ₹0.03/conversation
LOW+
Tech debt risk
40K+ lines documented. Clean Arch + DDD + SOLID. CTO Panel B+.
| Year | Yottix Path | In-House Path | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | ₹3.71 Cr | ₹2.96 Cr | ₹75L saved |
| Year 2 | ₹1.50 Cr (maintenance + Phase 2+) | ₹2.20 Cr (team + infra) | ₹70L more |
| Year 3 | ₹1.20 Cr (ongoing vendor) | ₹2.30 Cr (team + scale) | ₹1.10 Cr more |
| 3-Year TCO | ₹6.41 Cr | ₹7.46 Cr | ₹1.05 Cr more |
BUILD IN-HOUSE
Year 1 savings
with 50% more scope
IP ownership
+ retained knowledge
FAANG-grade
architecture ready
AI-accelerated
development velocity
| Week 1 | Hire Backend Dev 1 + Mobile Dev 1 + AI Engineer |
| Week 2 | Start Sprint 1 — Gateway + Identity + Payments setup |
| Week 4 | Full team onboarded (9 people) |
| Week 6 | Alpha release — core flows working |
| Week 12 | MVP Beta launch |
"The architecture is ready. The prototype is built. We just need the team."
Wealth is not found. It is built.